Home Trusted by 200,000+ buyers
BACK Main Directory > Complementary & Alternative Medicine > Cancer pain drug may do more harm than good

Cancer pain drug may do more harm than good

02 October, 2012

A drug which for decades has been widely used to treat pain related to cancer has no net clinical benefit, researchers in the Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC) based at Flinders University have found.

The national study involved 185 patients with advanced cancer, 93 of whom received the drug ketamine while the other 92 received a placebo.

The results, published last week in the prestigious international Journal of Clinical Oncology, not only showed identical benefit between the two groups but revealed significantly higher rates of toxicity and other side-effects for those receiving ketamine.

Chief Investigator and Professor of Palliative and Supportive Services, David Currow said the results of the study have highlighted the potential harm that can be caused by prescribing "off label" – that is, using drugs in ways other than originally intended – without adequate trials.

"The role of ketamine in routine clinical care for chronic, complex cancer pain is not in any way supported by this study. The result is resoundingly negative," Professor Currow said.

"At sub-anaesthetic doses, ketamine has been shown to help in post-operative pain relief; so the trial of it in cancer-related pain, where the nerve itself is damaged, was a very logical step," he said.

"The question is, can you take information from one patient population and just automatically apply it to another population? The short answer is you can’t."

Professor Currow said that "robust data" were needed to inform the care of people with advanced life-limiting illnesses.

"These people deserve exactly the same quality of care that anyone else gets in the health system. In fact, they’re more at risk than anyone else of adverse outcomes," he said.

"They’re frail, they’re often on many medications but they’re not necessarily old – one in three is under the age of 65 in Australia."

This study is the first to be published by PaCCSC, which is funded under the national Palliative Care Program and supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing to test the effectiveness of various medications in order to improve symptom management and quality of care in patients living with a terminal illness.

Other research currently underway includes the world’s largest study on the use of anti-psychotic medications to treat acute confusion, or delirium.

"It’s going to inform practice around the world, not just in palliative care but in the frail and elderly, people after operations or major trauma, people with acute infections: all are at very great risk of becoming acutely confused," Professor Currow said.

Have your say...

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers
Reload characters
Type the characters you see in this box. This helps us prevent automated programs from sending spam.
bruni brewin | Wednesday, October 3, 2012, 6:11 PM
I would like to thank the PaCCSC at Flinders University for their research. I am seeing more research suggesting medications that were used for one use we are now being told that it can be used for another disorder. Also another article that I read on anti-psychotic medication scripts having doubled for such things as depression without patients being told that these drugs are anti-psychotic drugs. As the article also stated that we have a 1.0 to 1.5% of the public who are psychotic, we should ask the question of why we are using this drug on such a large percentage of the population? The article referred to the American population, and I would hope that we don't follow that trend over here.