Medical Search Australia Trusted by 250,000+ buyers

Should the law on assisted dying be changed?

03 May, 2011

Assisted dying is a complex issue with strongly held views on both sides of the argument.

On, two experts go head to head over whether the law in the UK should be changed to make assisted dying legal.

Former Professor of Geriatric Medicine at the University of Manchester, Raymond Tallis, has changed from a position of opposing assisted dying to advocating a change in the law. He is also Patron of the organisation Dignity in Dying.

He says his previous view was based on incorrect assumptions including the view that better palliative care can always alleviate unbearable suffering. With 35 years of working in geriatric medicine behind him, Tallis says that doctors increasingly have to resort to sedating patients to control pain, and that good palliative care does not mean legalised assisted dying is not needed.

To support his view Tallis says that 90% of patients in Oregon who requested assisted dying came from excellent hospices. And in Belgium, increased investment in palliative care was introduced just before the euthanasia laws.

He also argues that assisted dying laws would not erode trust in the medical profession – indeed a survey of nine European countries puts the level of trust in the Netherlands at the top.

He talks about his previous concern that assisted dying would be offered to or imposed on vulnerable people, but says that the Oregon experience points in the opposite direction, with an under-representation of those who are traditionally thought of as disempowered who seek help to die.

Tallis maintains that while only a few individuals would require assisted dying, many more would be comforted from knowing it is available if necessary. He concludes that "living well includes dying well and supporting a dying person who seeks assistance to die is an expression of this."

At the opposite end of the spectrum, Kevin Fitzpatrick, a researcher from the organisation Not Dead Yet and someone who is also disabled, says doctors should not be put in the position of deciding which lives are worth living.

He refers to a Dutch doctor who said the clinical team agonised all day over the first case of euthanasia, but the second case was easier and the third case was a piece of cake. Fitzpatrick says he has heard reports that many elderly people in Holland are so frightened about euthanasia that they carry cards saying that they do not want it.

Fitzpatrick argues that "disabled people, like others, and often with more reason, need to feel safe" and that legalising assisted dying would threaten disabled people's "well-being, continuing care and management and life itself."

He concludes that the issue is complex and involves deep moral questions but that "the lives of many disabled people depend on resisting attempts to introduce a law legalising the intentional act of killing."

Source: BMJ

Have your say...

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers
Reload characters
Type the characters you see in this box. This helps us prevent automated programs from sending spam.
Bruni Brewin | Thursday, May 5, 2011, 1:38 PM
If I make a will of what I want done with my accumulated wealth and property - then I expect that the executor and legal people abide by the wishes of my will. If I make a will of what I want done with my health when it gets to a stage that I am no longer able to make that decision for myself, then I expect that the doctors and legal people abide by the wishes of my will. I have made a decision that should I die from an accident that my body parts may be used to save another s life. It is a simple legal decision on a piece of paper that gives the authority to allow that to happen. I want a law that allows for my wishes to be legal so that we don't have to do what people did 500 years ago who assisted their elders by putting them outside in the cold overnight air so that they caught pneumonia to assist them to die rather than suffer further. I have more compassion for my dog who I assisted to die, when she could no longer continue a life without pain. What right have doctors or anyone else for that matter got to make me suffer against my wishes?